Şimdi Ara

Yorumsuz...

Daha Fazla
Bu Konudaki Kullanıcılar: Daha Az
2 Misafir - 2 Masaüstü
5 sn
38
Cevap
0
Favori
1.512
Tıklama
Daha Fazla
İstatistik
  • Konu İstatistikleri Yükleniyor
0 oy
Öne Çıkar
Sayfa: 12
Sayfaya Git
Git
sonraki
Giriş
Mesaj
  • WreckedExotics

    Belki biliyorsunuzdur ancak bilmeyenlerde vardır belki...

    Yukarıdaki Linkte karşılaşacağınız bazı araçlar...

     Yorumsuz...


     Yorumsuz...


     Yorumsuz...



    < Bu mesaj bu kişi tarafından değiştirildi SaM -- 7 Eylül 2004, 23:54:16 >







  • way anasını....
  • insan bunları görünce bi tuhaf oluyor, acaba içindekiler sağ çıkmışmıdır.
  • arabaların bu halleri çok güzelmiş
  • olm zaten çoğu güvenli olmayan otomobiller.
    bir M3 e bakın mesela(e36 kasa)
    euro ncap tan sadece 1* alabildi.
    durumun vahiyetini görün.
    bir de ford escorta bakın - 98 de 2** aldı.
    yani bir escort bile daha güvenli
  • Çüş beaa
  • Abi yazık olmauş makinelere.
  • Yapay Zeka’dan İlgili Konular
    Efsan foto çekimim (Ss li)
    6 yıl önce açıldı
    Daha Fazla Göster
  • Gül gibi arabalar gitmiş
  • YAZIK OLMUŞ
  • millet alamaz bunlar parçalamış
  • dikkat etmek lazım
  • Öyle bi olay benim başıma gelirse ölmesem bile İntihar ederim heralde
  • M.c.k yorumların çok tuhaf abi yaa rahatsız oldum ben ne 1 yıldızı ne 2 yıldızı kafam karıştı hocam konuya açıklık getir aydınlat beni ne güvenli değiL sen hangi galakside yaşıyorsun severim seni ama aç şu konuları biraz ......

    birkere kaza yapan arabalar sırayla dodge viper sağlam arabadır , lamborghini murcielago ki sağlam demeyene şaşarım aracın şasis karbon fiber amma en güvenli araçlardan birisi 100 km hızda 33 metre gibi bir mesafede durabilen araçlar ki şaşi insan güvenli için bu gibi araçlarda çok önemli ve bu arabada yapılan kazalar öle 80-90km hızda olmuyor tahmin edildiği üzre 200km sınırında yaşanıyor ve bu gibi durumlar olası ki son resim audi EURO NCAP 5 yıldız abonesi ki &.yıldız olsa adamlar alacak yaniii bence biraz daha açık olmalısın ben senin bugğnki yorumlarını anlayamadım

     Yorumsuz...

     Yorumsuz...




  • M.C.K kardesım.Sen neden her yerde Escortu one suruyosunkı.200+ km/h ile gir bakayım bi direğe escort ile bak baklım nasıl sekız oluyo (oluyosunuz).Yapma gozunu seveyım sen nasıl M3 le Escorttu karsılastırısın.



    < Bu mesaj bu kişi tarafından değiştirildi OrMaNcI -- 17 Eylül 2004, 20:37:01 >
  • Bu resimlerdeki araçlara ne olmuş yaw trenle filanmı carpışmışlar anlıyamadım yaw



    < Bu mesaj bu kişi tarafından değiştirildi Robinson_Crusoe -- 17 Eylül 2004, 20:39:54 >
  • zaten 100 tane yi geçkin vardı bende kazalı arabaların resmi

     Yorumsuz...


     Yorumsuz...


     Yorumsuz...



    < Bu mesaj bu kişi tarafından değiştirildi Buraks23 -- 18 Eylül 2004, 10:44:46 >




  • quote:

    Orjinalden alıntı: OrMaNcI

    M.C.K kardesım.Sen neden her yerde Escortu one suruyosunkı.200+ km/h ile gir bakayım bi direğe escort ile bak baklım nasıl sekız oluyo (oluyosunuz).Yapma gozunu seveyım sen nasıl M3 le Escorttu karsılastırısın.

    bak şimdi bu escort:
     Yorumsuz...

    The Ford Escort is an old design that shows safety shortcomings. Euro NCAP tested the car a year ago but held off publishing the results when Ford announced that it was to undergo structural improvements which would affect its crash performance and that upgraded model is tested here. One area where the Escort performed strongly was pedestrian protection, where it came very close to obtaining a three-star rating – beating newer rivals including many tested here.

    Impact Protection

    Driver Front Impact Passenger Front Impact Driver Side Impact

    Frontal Impact The passenger compartment became unstable during the impact and crash intrusion presented problems. The side of the driver’s footwell ruptured near the sill and the driver’s legs were exposed to a high risk of disabling injuries from unprotected metal brackets. What’s more, the steering column shroud did not contain any energy absorbing material or deflector plate to lessen damage to the driver’s legs. The brake pedal was forced backwards by the front impact, risking feet and lower leg injuries. Finally, impact forces transmitted to the passenger’s chest by his seat belt were assessed as 'high'.

    Side Impact When the Escort was first tested, results showed that its driver ran a high risk of serious or fatal chest injury in this type of impact. Following this, Ford modified the vehicle’s side structure and it was reassessed. Safety performance improved sufficiently so that the revised car just passed new regulations (a requirement for designs launched after October 1998). Even so, there was still a risk of serious chest injury for the driver.

    Child Protection The restraints gave adequate protection in the frontal-impact test and kept their occupants from flying forward and hitting cabin furniture. In the side impact, the older child’s head was not contained within the restraint.

    Pedestrian Protection The bonnet was less of a threat to pedestrians than those of many rivals but other areas need improvement to reduce the risk of disabling leg injuries.

    Model History & Safety Equipment The latest Escort was launched in January 1995. The 1999 car has undergone structural improvements to improve safety (see above for VINs of upgraded cars) and features a driver’s airbag, front belt pre-tensioners and webbing grabbers and power steering as standard on all models wherever sold in the EU.


    bak bu da eski kasa 3serisi:
     Yorumsuz...

    The 3-series' cabin became structurally unstable during the frontal impact and the driver ran a risk of life-threatening chest injury. The distance by which the steering wheel was displaced backwards posed further risks of injury, while stiff aggressive structures in the lower facia area also added greatly to the chances of the driver sustaining serious knee, thigh and pelvis injuries. In the side-impact test, protection for the driver's abdomen failed to meet coming 1998 legislation for new models.

    Impact Protection

    Driver Front Impact Passenger Front Impact Driver Side Impact

    Frontal Impact In the frontal impact, the 3-series suffered excessive movement of the screen pillar. The cabin became unstable, the driver's door lost structural integrity and the beam supporting the facia became partly separated from the car's side. The driver's door could be opened by hand after the test, but moderate force was needed. The passenger's door could be opened normally. The steering wheel was pushed backwards by 223mm (8.8in) and upwards by 14mm (0.6in). The impact resulted in excessive footwell intrusion, with the brake pedal being pushed rearwards by 321mm (12.6in).

    The standard-fit airbag triggered late and failed to offer adequate protection; the steering wheel also intruded too far into the car's cabin. This intrusion might have increased the probability of serious injury for different sized drivers or those in different seating positions. Neck protection was good. High levels of force transmitted via the seat belt, and the driver's chest hitting the steering wheel with sufficient force to bend it badly posed a high risk of injury. Facia-level intrusion and the instability of the cabin may have added to the level of hazard for different-sized drivers or those in different seating positions, so chest protection was down-rated to 'poor'. Had the impact occurred slightly differently, it could have caused greater facia intrusion. The driver's left knee struck the lower facia to the left of the steering column. Protection for that knee, thigh and pelvis was down-rated from 'good' to 'marginal': if the knee had impacted in a slightly different position horizontally or vertically, it could have hit the steering column or its adjuster locking bracket. The steering column, its adjuster or its mounting bracket could also have caused localised knee injuries. The driver's right knee struck the facia to the right of the steering column. Protection for the knee, thigh and pelvis was down-rated from 'weak' to 'poor': if this knee had been in a slightly different position, it could have struck a steering column stabilisation tube or a facia support bracket. Such rigid structures could also have been hit if the knee had penetrated the facia further. Furthermore, the column adjuster or facia brackets could have produced localised injury, as could the brake pivot or column stabilising tube. Excessive intrusion into the footwell presented a serious risk of foot and ankle injury. After the test the dummy's left foot was found to have become trapped between the car's firewall and the floor.

    Protection for the passenger was generally good, although forces transmitted by the seat belt could have caused chest injuries. Results obtained from the passenger dummy were not modified on the basis of any structural damage to the car.

    Side Impact Side impact
    The driver's head and pelvis were well protected but the amount of protection provided for his chest was rated as 'weak', and for his abdomen, 'poor'.

    Child Protection The adult belt’s anchorage sits forward of the child seat attachment points, and provides no restraint for the first part of any forward movement during a crash. This allowed the seats to twist in the test. The dummies travelled a long way forwards and, although their heads did not hit the front seats, the smaller dummy recorded a risk of serious injury. Child seat instruction labels are not clear.

    Pedestrian Protection Child head impact
    Three of the six locations met proposed legislation. One was above the bonnet stay, one above the throttle cable housing and the last was on a bonnet crease. Two points were better than average but one point, situated above the corner of the battery, was worse.

    Upper leg impact
    None of the three tests met proposed legislation. On the bonnet's leading edge, all three locations were worse than average at the centre-line of the car, the inboard edge of one of the headlights and in line with the headlight centre.

    Adult head impact
    One location met proposed legislation: on the washer nozzle. The point above the brake fluid reservoir came close to requirements. Four points were better than average, one worse: above the bonnet hinge.

    Leg impact
    None of the three tests met the proposed requirements. The tests were worse than average at all three locations.

    Model History & Safety Equipment The 3-series was introduced late in 1990. The 1997 model-year car has anti-lock brakes, door beams, driver airbag with belt force limiter, height-adjustable front belts with webbing grabber as standard. Side airbags and a passenger airbag with belt force limiter are options, but were not fitted. New 3-series due next year.
    Make, model and hand of drive BMW 316i RHD
    Body type 4-door saloon
    Model year 1997
    Kerb weight 1225

    sonra gel de niye escortu övüyorsun de!
    ben escortu övmüyorum ama o kadar güçlü bir bmw nini 64 kmh ile bir çarpışmada avrupa da çok fazla satılmış bir otomobilden bile güvensiz olması bayağı büyük bir sorun.
    hayatta bir e 36 kasa m3 e binmem
    sana escortla yaptığımız kazanın resimleri de yollarım o zaman anlarsın neden bu adam escortu seviyor diye




  • m.c.k e36 m3 e binmem diye laf maf atma simdi. J9 a binen adam M3 e binemeyecek sacmaladin simdi.BUlsan da alsan Bi M3 bu sefer ustune araba tanimazsin ha...
  • M.c.K kafan güzel herhalde hiç gerek yok.......işten anlamıyorsun dicem kalbin kırılacak elma ile armutu aynı kefeye koyma.......
  • ya kaldırın su resmi arabalarin olusunu gormek istemiyorum yazik be araba sahibinden sevgi ilgi aldikca onu herzaman korur ben buna inaniyorum bu arabalarin sahibi ilgi gostermemis arabalarina

    Boyle gorunce uzuluyorum ya
  • 
Sayfa: 12
Sayfaya Git
Git
sonraki
- x
Bildirim
mesajınız kopyalandı (ctrl+v) yapıştırmak istediğiniz yere yapıştırabilirsiniz.