Üye Girişi
Bağlan Google+ ile Bağlan Facebook ile Bağlan
Yeni Kayıt
Tüm Forumlar
  • Tüm Forumlar
  • Eğitim ve Sınavlar
  • Yabancı Diller ve Dil Eğitimi
  • İngilizce
  • Bu Konuda
Şimdi Ara

acill ceviri

Sıcak Fırsatlarda Tıklananlar
Editörün Seçtiği Fırsatlar
Daha Fazla
Bu Konudaki Kullanıcılar: Daha Az
2 Misafir (1 Mobil) - 1 Masaüstü, 1 Mobil
5 sn
2
Cevap
0
Favori
313
Tıklama
Daha Fazla
İstatistik
  • Konu İstatistikleri Yükleniyor
Konuya Özel
0 oy
Öne Çıkar
Cevapla
Sayfa: 1
Giriş
Mesaj
  • acilen su metni cevirirmisiniz cok acil lutfen beyler




    This November, I encourage the people of Arkansas to vote NO on a referendum to repeal the
    state’s motorcycle helmet law. The state’s current helmet law saves hundreds of lives per year, and it is
    senseless that people should be injured or killed merely because they are too vain to wear a helmet.
    Furthermore, helmet laws help to reduce public expenditures on health care and have even been shown
    to deter motorcycle theft. For these reasons, the citizens of Arkansas must oppose this referendum.
    One hardly needs to appeal to statistics to show that helmets protect motorcyclists against injury
    or death. For those who are skeptical, however, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    (NHTSA) calculates that in an accident helmets reduce the likelihood of fatal injury by 29%. After
    California passed its helmet law in 1992, that state saw motorcycle-related fatalities decrease by 37% in a
    single year. These statistics are impossible to ignore. If motorcyclists wish to protect themselves against
    injury and death, they should wear a helmet whenever they ride.
    Many opponents of the helmet law agree that helmets save motorcyclists’ lives, but insist that the
    decision to wear a helmet should be left to the individual rider. Perhaps this argument would be valid if
    motorcyclists were the only ones negatively affected by their decision, but this is not the case. A 2002
    study by the NHTSA concluded that only about half of all injured motorcyclists were properly insured,
    which means many of these riders likely relied on public funds to subsidize their healthcare costs. If the
    citizens of Arkansas choose to repeal the helmet law, we can expect these costs to rise significantly, and
    at a time when our state is in a financial crisis.
    Helmet laws can also help reduce motorcycle theft. Few thieves think to bring a helmet with them
    when they steal a motorcycle, which makes them much easier for police to spot. In addition to making it
    easier to apprehend motorcycle thieves and recover stolen bikes, evidence shows that helmet laws can
    deter motorcycle theft from happening in the first place. After Texas enacted a statewide helmet law,
    cities there saw rates of motorcycle theft drop by up to 44%. A drop in the rates of motorcycle theft
    directly reduces law enforcement expenses related to this crime, which is another benefit to all citizens.
    Opponents of the helmet law offer two main arguments. First, the law’s detractors argue that
    properly educating riders is the best way to avoid accidents. I agree entirely; all motorcycle riders should
    be properly educated and should ride their bikes responsibly. Some accidents, however, are unavoidable,
    and as I have argued, helmets significantly reduce health care expenditures associated with all accidents.
    Second, opponents argue that helmet laws infringe on their personal freedom. Again, I agree that the
    government should avoid constraining individual choice whenever possible, but as I have shown, the
    decision to wear a helmet does not affect only the rider, so this issue is not a simple matter of individual
    liberty. The government must not allow a few individuals to make society bear the burden of their
    irresponsible choices.
    In a perfect world, helmet laws would not be necessary because all riders would wear them
    voluntarily. However, we do not live in a perfect world. Therefore we must require motorcyclists to make
    this socially responsible decision. As I have argued, helmet laws not only benefit motorcyclists, but all
    citizens. Please join me this November in voting NO on the referendum to repeal the state helmet law.







  • ben başlıyayım gerisini getirsin arkadaslar :)

    Bu kasımda Arkansaslıları devletin motorsiklet kask kanunları refarundumunda hayır oyu vermesi icin cesaretlendirecegim.Devletin kask kanunu her yıl yüzlerce hayat kurtarıyor
    • Yapay Zeka’dan İlgili Konular
    Acil Yardim Pls
    2 hafta önce açıldı
    Vag-Com Turkce ariyorum yardim
    14 yıl önce açıldı
    ARKADASLAR LUTFEN YARDIMM
    6 yıl önce açıldı
    Daha Fazla Göster
    
Sayfa: 1

Benzer içerikler

- x
Bildirim
mesajınız kopyalandı (ctrl+v) yapıştırmak istediğiniz yere yapıştırabilirsiniz.
Hizmet kalitesi için çerezleri kullanabiliriz, DH'yi kullanırken depoladığımız çerezlerle ilgili veri politikamıza gözatın.
Kabul Ediyorum